The Conundrum

The puzzle, the Enigma—if you wish, in our ancient language, n n n i a r i (NE R)—means puzzle, Enigma, or conundrum. There are four parts to this particular conundrum, specifically designed to rewire your brain by pondering it. This is done to make you more receptive to other-dimensional frequencies of information and interaction, to accelerate the idea of open contact, and to just open you up to more connection to your higher mind and other levels of consciousness within existence.

We are going to present four ideas, four concepts, one after the other for you to ponder in the order in which we deliver them. Now, remember: it’s not about necessarily getting an answer. It’s more about the idea of simply repeating these four concepts in order in your head for about 15 minutes a day. You can do it up to three times a day if you wish, but no more than that. You can do it once, you can do it twice, you can do it three times. But when you go through the four points, the four concepts again, it’s not about seeking a solution. It’s about simply going through them and letting yourself ponder them, imagine what they represent, visualize them if you wish. That’s fine. And as you do this over and over again for 15 minutes each time, by just pondering these things, by imagining, by visualizing them as best as you can, you will start to feel the rewiring of your brain in a certain way that again will make you a more receptive antenna to receive higher dimensional, other-dimensional information, frequencies, and interactions.

So let us begin. In this order, ponder these four concepts:

1. A finite number of finite universes.
2. A finite number of infinite universes.
3. An infinite number of finite universes.
4. An infinite number of infinite universes.

Just ponder those four concepts. Let them come into your mind, visualize them, imagine them, feel them out.

Feel what each one feels like. Whether you come up with what seems to be at first a solution to any of those four, don’t let it stay there. Just ponder them.

It’s all right if you come up with an answer, but don’t necessarily assume that it is the answer. Because as you go through this conundrum, as you examine these four points, these four concepts over and over again, you will find that things may begin to seem a little less concrete or crystallized than you thought.

The answers, when they come, may not necessarily be as definitive the second time or the third time or the fourth time that you may do it within the 15-minute span each time.

So that’s all right if it seems to get a little fuzzy, if the barriers between them seem to get a little bit vague. That’s all right.

This exercise is simply for the purpose of pondering these things, musing about them, feeling them, visualizing, imagining them as best you can. It’s not about getting an answer or finding a solution.

So we present this to you as one of the exercises that we will be presenting to you along the course of the “Eye of the Needle” passage that we’re all in right now with you, to help you through, to streamline yourself, to open you up and make you more receptive to inspiration and more abilities to let go of those belief systems that do not serve you.

So you can pass through this passageway, this time of change and shift and transformation, more easily, more profoundly, with more abilities coming out the other end. This is the beginning of your training, open contact training. We have started this process with the idea of the images of extraterrestrials that we talked about before, and this is another part of the beginning of your training to open up to be more capable of perceiving other realities, other beings from other dimensions, parallel realities.

It is up to you to realize that as you go through this conundrum, you will rewire your brain in whatever way works best for you. Nothing will be forced upon you. It is in your hands; it is under your control.

The way you go about musing about this, visualizing this, feeling your way through it, the way you ponder this will be what determines how you rewire yourself to be a more receptive antenna for these higher dimensional energies.

So enjoy, have fun with the conundrum. As I said, in the meditation today we will take you through it for the first time. Doesn’t mean you have to do it exactly in the way we take you through it, but it does have to be done in the order in which we have delivered it to you. That will be most effective. We have designed this and used this on our world for hundreds of years. It will have an effect.

So just play with it, just relax, just go with the flow, as we say, because your flow knows exactly where you need to go, and it will allow you to rewire yourself in exactly the way that’s appropriate for the unique individual that you happen to be, the unique reflection of All That Is that you are.

Questions

Political Polarization in Slovenia and Europe

Vly: My name is Vly and I come from Slovenia, which at the moment is going through some challenges with the government and the protests.

I feel like there is an amplification of different opposing ideologies. Could you give some guidance and clarity regarding this situation in Slovenia and also in similar countries with similar situations around Europe?

Bashar: Yes. You’re getting everything out on the table—much more clear expressions and examples to decide for yourself what you are and are not vibrationally compatible with, and how you prefer or don’t prefer to experience the idea of your particular version of physical reality.

Without the idea of an explicit expression of things that are polarized, you can’t necessarily as clearly decide what it is you prefer by contrast. So all these things are coming out in the wash, as you say, to make themselves more apparent, more clear, so that it’s easier to discern what is and isn’t “you.”

This is erupting around your planet at this time because this is the time for it, in this age of transformation, to decide which version of the parallel reality Earth you really prefer, and which versions you do not prefer.

Again, not as a value judgment or an invalidation of the other choices you don’t prefer, but making it more easy for you to determine what you do prefer in an objective way.

Creative Expression and Acting

Actress: I want to ask you about creative expression as an actress. I’m very happy to be here. I have a nagging voice saying, “You should do more.”

Bashar: When you say you feel you could be doing more, are there opportunities that you could be acting on and creating on your own with your own imagination that you can take advantage of that you’re not doing? Is that what you mean?

Questioner: I do mean that. And the thing that I do is that I automatic write to find… to find what it is that I’m wanting to share and what format it’s in.

Bashar: Well, you said you’re an actor.

Questioner: I’m an actress. Yes. And that is my primary passion/expression, although we understand there can be others. Yes, that is my primary passion.

Bashar: All right. So when you say you feel you could be doing more, does that mean you could be creating your own opportunities rather than waiting for them to come?

Questioner: Yes, that’s what that means.

Bashar: And are you doing any of that at all?

Questioner: I’m at a place where I need to begin again. I’ve done other things like I’ve learned how to do standup comedy, I’ve learned how to pitch a TV show, I’ve learned how to write a TV show. And now it’s new. I start again, and I don’t know where to start again.

Bashar: All right. But writing and pitching, while wonderful, are not acting, correct? So can you put something together in which you can actually act?

Questioner: Yes, I could do that.

Bashar: Um, so why aren’t you?

Questioner: Because… the reason why is because—and I’m sure this must be part of the negative belief system—says I don’t know how or where to begin.

Bashar: Oh, well, that’s nonsensical. Okay. Do you have friends that are also actors?

Questioner: Yes.

Bashar: Can you not write something in which you can all act and just get together and act it out, whether you’re doing it for the public or not?

Questioner: Yes, I could do that.

Bashar: Well, would that be exciting for you to do that with them? You’re hesitating.

Questioner: Yes, I’m hesitating to answer that.

Bashar: This is what the hesitation is about. The hesitation is that the next sort of negative belief comes in: “Unless you’re going to share it with the world, then what’s the point?”

The point is that you’re acting. Do you remember what we’ve said about the idea that acting on your passion has to be done for its own sake and not for what you think it will get you?

Questioner: Yes.

Bashar: Well, you need to apply that. If you remember that concept… so the idea is, if you’re really passionate about acting, you’ll do everything in your power to act in any way you can, regardless of whether anyone in the public knows about it or not.

Paradoxically, if you understand how these things work, you will also understand that it’s quite probable that if you just get together and act with your friends with something you’ve created or they’ve created, you have started to create a kind of club. And that can grow.

Because that can grow, every one of those individuals may have avenues and routes and ways and paths of allowing you to expand this to the point where the public will become aware of what you’re doing, and you will attract opportunities that will allow you to expand the idea of your acting. But if you are invalidating the idea of just getting together with your friends to act because that’s your passion, then you yourself are closing the doors through which other opportunities to express yourself publicly could come to you, because you have this assumption and invalidation that just getting together with your friends to act can’t possibly lead to that.

Questioner: That’s great because… what you just did was you took that pressure off. Because the truth is, I don’t really care about that. It doesn’t matter to me who sees it or doesn’t see it. It’s just I had it in my mind that to flow creative energy, it must have a receptor, and if it doesn’t, then you’re missing the point. But by having other people act with you, you have receptors. Great. I like that much, much, much better.

Bashar: Then we would assume that you will act on it much, much, much more quickly.

Questioner: Got it. Thanks, Bashar. I feel lighter.

Bashar: From Bashar, the acting coach, double duty.

Contemporary Classical Music and Frequency

Fence, France: I am Fence, a French music composer playing violin and living in Provence on the south coast of France.

The question is about contemporary classical music. Mozart, Beethoven, and many composers were misunderstood in their time for their musical innovations. Today, modern classical music is even much more dissonant, discordant, strident, shrill, sometimes even ear-splitting. Is it that contemporary classical music is turning to an abstract mental neurotic construction, or is it that contemporary classical music is going to a higher frequency of vibration which is difficult to comprehend and to adjust to from our planet and our human ears? Thank you so much. Bashar, you are a tremendous inspiration in my life.

Bashar: The question you are asking… the answer to that is both.

There are things that are representative of realities that are splitting off that are more disharmonious and discordant, and there are realities where higher frequencies are creating more harmony and are representative of an upliftment of energy and vibrational states. Now, that doesn’t mean that that discordant music now and then can’t be applied for positive purposes, so it may not completely be eliminated even from the reality where things are becoming more harmonious and integrated. And it doesn’t mean that harmonies can’t be utilized even in some of the discordant realities that might be reflective of the notes that you are saying are more strident. So you have to kind of take it on a case-by-case basis. But in the overall sense, yes, you may find that certain realities and individuals that might be experiencing more disharmony and discord within themselves might relate more easily to the idea of the discordant music. But it might be capable of being utilized as a guiding light and a reminder—or a guiding sound, if you wish—and a reminder of the discord that may exist within themselves, if they choose to use it that way. But the basic and simple answer is: both are true.

Acting on Passion and Excitement

Questioner: The meditation you gave um at the beginning there.

Bashar: Well, I haven’t given the meditation yet. I’ve only told you the components of it. But yes, of course. You’re welcome. So my questions… one of my questions is um, I find it challenging to actually act on my passion, to live my passion.

Bashar: Um, which is what? Find it sometimes challenging to… excuse me, you say to act on your passion, which is what? Can you be specific?

Questioner: Well, in any… in any given circumstance. And more generally in terms of um, things like creative pursuits or…

Bashar: Oh, all right. But it’s actually quite nonsensical, and I actually don’t believe you. You can’t do it because you’re doing it right now. We assume that you’re having this conversation because this particular action contained some degree of excitement for you more than any other option at this moment.

So you can do it, and you are doing it. It’s just that you have a definition that makes it seem more difficult than it needs to be. Please do remember—and we’ll get to the other stuff in a moment—but please do remember, when we talk about acting on your passion, it doesn’t have to be a big project, a lifelong spanning career. We’re talking about every single moment. There is always an option that contains even just the tiniest bit more excitement, attractiveness, curiosity than any other that you have more capability of acting on than any other. So you may find that sometimes talking to a friend, or reading a book, or eating a meal, or watching a film—any of the typical daily things that contains even just the tiniest bit more attractiveness or excitement—is the one to do first. That’s what we mean fundamentally by “always act on your passion.” And if you start on that level, on an everyday level, it can build up. It might snowball into bigger and bigger and bigger opportunities being presented to you that you can also act on that might also be representative of your passion. But you don’t have to make a bigger deal out of it than it needs to be at the beginning. So there doesn’t need to be confusion because it’s just about choosing what seems more exciting than anything else and act on it to the best you can until you can act on it no further. That’s all it means. Does that help start to clarify the concept?

Questioner: I… no, I appreciate that. And it’s something that um, I’ve been aware of. And I get into a space where I… I ask myself, “Okay, what’s the next most exciting thing?” All right.

Bashar: But I assume we’re having this conversation because there are times when you choose to get out of that space. Why would that be?

Questioner: There are times… sorry, there’s times when I… I don’t ask myself that question.

Bashar: Why not?

Questioner: I think when I do ask myself that question, sometimes I… I don’t… the answer doesn’t become apparent. I’m not sure which is the most exciting uh, option. Um, I feel like I… I can overthink it perhaps.

Bashar: And yes, many people on your planet do that. Overthink it. Overcomplicate it. Remember that if things seem equal in excitement or equal in your ability to act on them, you might as well then just flip a coin. And what I just said to the last person can apply to you. It doesn’t then matter if all things appear equal, which one you take first. You might as well flip a coin. A, I’ll go this way. B, I’ll choose that. Because if that’s not your path of least resistance, synchronicity will turn you around to the other path. That is, you have to really understand how synchronicity works as a guiding and organizing principle in order to relax and let the flow happen naturally, and let the signals and the messages from synchronicity be obvious. But if you overthink it, you’re only going to confuse yourself and you’re going to blind yourself to what synchronicity is attempting to do to make it clearer as to which way to go and what to act on at any given moment. Is that helping?

Questioner: That’s helpful. Yes. Thank you. Is there a “but” at the end of that sentence? Well, I mean, because excitement, as you’ve spoken about, can be… um, an emotion. Many different emotions can be passion, can be love, can be a sense of calmness. Yes. So if we have different options which contain the… the different um, emotions… yes. Sometimes to me that can be hard to navigate.

Bashar: I just explained that. I’ll explain it again more clearly if you wish. You don’t always, when you find something that seems more exciting than anything else, or things that seem equally exciting in different ways… you don’t always have the same ability to act on them. That’s another way to tell which one to act on first. But as I just said, if you do discover that two things or three things seem equally exciting, equally attractive, and you have the ability equally to act on any of them, then it doesn’t matter which one you choose first. Because if it’s not the one that serves you best, synchronicity will create situations that turn you around to the one that is. So what difference does it make if you can’t tell the difference, since synchronicity will actually be your compass needle to guide you? So why worry about it?

Questioner: It was more a case of if something feels um, nurturing to me, and maybe another… another option feels more exciting in a different… in a different way. Yes. Then what’s the difference?

Bashar: As long as you’re clear as to why you feel the way you do based on your belief system—because we understand, I’m not saying this is the case with you, but just to explain—you say, “Well, one feels nurturing and one feels exciting.” Either of those are fine, aren’t they?

Questioner: Yes. No. Yeah, that’s true.

Bashar: So what difference does it make, as long as you’re clear that the idea you’re now describing as “nurturing” isn’t an avoidance? Do you understand? Because sometimes people will create the idea of, “Oh well, this feels more nurturing,” but what they’re really doing is saying, “I’m too scared to go the other way, so I’ll choose the one that sort of feels safe to me.” That’s why you have to be very clear about what you believe in order to understand why you feel what you feel in any case, in any situation. So fine, one choice seems nurturing, which is fine. Another seems more exciting, which is fine. Those can be equal things. But ask yourself: Why does this feel nurturing? Why does this feel exciting? And in that investigation, you may find that there’s enough of a difference for you to be able to make a choice more clearly, because you may find that the nurturing is from an avoidance or something else that’s a negative belief, and vice versa. So the idea is, when you clear yourself as to why you have the feelings you have, and if it turns out that both truly are from a natural state or expression of your passion, then again we go back to: it doesn’t matter which one you choose first. You might as well flip a coin.

Questioner: There’s basically an option in my life which, although it’s not exciting, it provides a level of support which will mean I can then go on to do more exciting things potentially.

Bashar: But again, be careful, because what you just said sounds like you’re saying, “Well, if I do this, I’ll get that.” That’s not how you act on your excitement. You’re making that conditional now in the way you just phrased it. “Oh, I’ll do this cuz it’s going to get me somewhere else.” That’s not the reason to act on your excitement. And therefore, that may be your first clue that that may not be the most exciting thing, because all you’re talking about it is as a means to an end and not the thing in and of itself that’s exciting. Remember, excitement has to be acted on for its own sake, purely because that thing is exciting to you. So in other words, you have to be excited about feeling nurtured, not just use the idea of being in a nurtured space to get you somewhere else more exciting. You’re making conditions there. Yeah. And you’re invalidating the nurturing as nothing more than a means to an end and not a thing unto itself that you’re actually excited about. Does that help clarify the choice?

Questioner: Yeah. Thank you.

The Essassani Solar System

Questioner: Please describe your solar system.

Bashar: It was in the documentary that was done. We have a star like you do, called Sha.

We are, like you, the third planet from the star. There is a small planet closer, another planet second.

We are Essassani, which is third.

We are about 111 million of your miles from our star. Our year is longer than yours because our orbit is wider. Our day is about the same length, what you would call 24 hours, but our year is 454 days.

Then there is a fourth planet. But then we have a large planet called Vamar, which is not in the ecliptic. In other words, its orbit goes like this, up and down through the plane of our solar system.

And then we have a double planet, Chaupi, that has two planets that are gravitationally locked, orbiting each other.

In orbiting each other, they also go in an orbit around the star, dancing with each other, which is what Chachani means: “the dancers.” That’s a brief description of our solar system. But remember, we’re in a parallel reality. You can’t see our star from your reality.

You would have to make a shift to our vibrational reality in order to see our solar system, in the same way that we have to shift to your vibrational reality in order to perceive your solar system physically.

Precursors and Hybridization

Linda, Denmark: This is Linda from uh, Copenhagen, Denmark. I have a question regarding the precursors.

Can you please give a status report on the precursors? How many are currently on the planet? What is the age range? Are there uh, certain countries with a higher prevalence than other countries? And then as a side question to that, um, can you tell me a bit more about my own precursor nature? Because it was revealed to me about a year ago in a channeling that I am one of the precursors.

And so can you please give me some advice on how I can be of most usage with that type of incarnation I have chosen in this life? Um, I feel the mission is going well. Uh, I feel I am working towards getting humans used to more of an easy vibration. Though I would hear if you have any suggestions for how I can do my purpose. Um, yeah. So maybe some more specific practical uh, advises.

Bashar: Precursors are not born on your planet. None of the humans that are born on your planet are, by definition, precursors.

Precursors are those hybrids born off-planet that may come to your planet to take readings, to help acclimate the hybrids that will eventually come to live among you permanently. But no human should consider themselves a precursor in the definition we’re using.

Yes, there are many humans that understand that they are helping to prepare the way, but that’s not our definition of a precursor. So you can call yourselves helpers or preparers, but “precursors,” we’re using as a specific definition for beings born off the planet that are hybrids that may pass among you and take readings as to whether or not you’re ready, or how ready you are, for receiving the idea of the hybrid that will eventually come to live among you permanently. So anything else you wish to ask about precursors, understand that those are the beings you’re asking about. And if you were born on Earth, you’re not a precursor; you’re just a helper and a preparer, which is no small feat. We don’t mean to diminish it, but we’re using precursor in a very specific definition.

The precursors are still among you, from off-world, gauging, walking among you now and then to determine the energy that exists as to how ready you are to receive, ultimately in the years to come, the hybrid children that will eventually come to live on Earth permanently among you. So they take their readings by passing by you, and now and then they also see if you can sense that they are walking past you, to see exactly how sensitive your senses are to the existence of their energy nearby. Again, the idea is that they range in age from approximately what you would consider to be perhaps an older teenager to something somewhere in what you would perceive to be their 30s or so, in general. They are in almost every country on your planet at present. There are, between… this will fluctuate now and then because they are coming and going off your planet, but in general, you’ll find that there’s between 137 and about 144,000 of them on your planet at any given moment.

5th Density, Time-Space, and Consciousness

Questioner: Can you speak about the time-space fifth density body being used while the space-time fifth density body remains in fifth density, and how the bombardment of the particles change the locational variable relates to that?

Ra, the 6th density speaks about the time-space 5th density body being used while the space-time 5th density body remains in fifth density.

Bashar: That’s the relationship between the physical body and the physical mind and the higher mind in a non-physical form. That’s all you’re saying.

You have a soul which creates the idea of the non-physical higher mind in fifth density, but also has a projection into the idea of third and fourth density of a physical mind and a physical body experience. And so the idea of the higher mind and the physical mind together form the entire person that is having that particular journey.

Questioner: So how does the locational variable relate to that?

Bashar: The locational variable relates to that in the same way we’ve described it, because any kind of a change, any kind of sensation or experience that you recognize or label as movement of any kind, actually involves the changing of the locational variable.

So even a move like this involves changing the locational variable. You do it automatically, instinctively, and intuitively all the time. It’s just that we’re breaking it down for you in a way that can be applied in a broader sense technologically as well, if you wish.

Questioner: So at what dimension, by injecting yourself into another universe, does this happen?

Bashar: Well, it can still happen in a sequence of fourth-density realities because there are many parallel realities that are also physiological. Now, you may take advantage of the fact that you’re connecting with the higher mind in fifth density to allow you more efficacy in doing this, but you can still skip from frame to frame through a dynamic, shall we say, idea of fourth-density realities, physical realities, because you’re shifting all the time to create the idea anyway of even what appears to be one reality. And we do this by focusing thought? No. You simply do it by making choices, by what you believe to be true.

Thought is a secondary idea where you can ruminate on what it is you’ve chosen, but thought itself is not really the driving mechanism. Belief systems are. What you believe to be true is what shifts you. You can use thoughts to help navigate you to some degree, but really it comes down to what you believe to be true.

Questioner: And also, how does one densify or become visible from the non-physical or metaphysical?

Bashar: Instantaneously. You know, your question is not organized. How does one… word for the… the afterlife? I’m not sure what word to call that.

Questioner: Well, you can use afterlife. We understand that. You can say spirit realm, whatever you wish. Which is non-physical.

Bashar: But the idea is, it’s a lowering of frequency. It’s sort of analogous to the idea of the frequency changes that happen with water. You have steam, which is a higher frequency. You have water, which is a middle frequency. And you have ice, which is a lower frequency, say. So the idea of the spirit can be sort of likened to the idea of steam, and then you have the idea of the electromagnetic energy, which can kind of be likened to liquid water, and it’s a lower frequency than the steam or the spirit realm. And then you have the physical reality experience, which is a lowering of frequency again, sort of crystallizing your idea of spirit into a more solid-appearing form. Does that analogy help?

Questioner: So they’re really doing is they’re moving the space around them?

Bashar: Well, space is an illusion. You’re kind of being more technical than you need to be in this. What’s happening is simply a lowering or changing of frequency. Whatever space needs to be around them will automatically be reflected by the lowering of frequency, because remember, you can only experience what you’re the frequency of. So as you change your frequency, that determines what you experience around you. And as you lower it from spirit, you experience things that seem to contain more experiences of space and time, because that’s what goes hand-in-hand with the lower frequency. So it’s not like they’re deliberately moving space around them or anything. All they have to do is change the frequency, and whatever needs to happen to reflect that change will happen automatically. It’s built in.

Free Will and the Excitement Formula

Renee, Australia: My name is Renee from Adelaide, Australia. You said that the physical mind isn’t really in a position to know what our highest excitement is, and the process of discovering our excitement is to just act on the feeling.

So I’m just wondering if it’s the higher mind that decides what the exciting activity is. Where does that leave free will for us as our physical selves? So it… it sounds like it’s… it’s our non-physical self that decides what exciting activities we are going to do rather than our physical mind. Or is it a co-creation?

Bashar: It’s a co-creation. But this is a misquote. I have never said that the physical mind can’t decide what the exciting activity is. I have said the physical mind can’t insist on a particular outcome of the excitement of the passion. I have never said that you can’t decide what the excitement is or recognize it when it comes. Now, yes, yes, the higher mind does bring you—or synchronicity itself does bring you—certain circumstances and opportunities that are attempts to remind you what is representative as an activity of your passion, of your true self. So in that sense, you are still sending this to yourself. It’s not that the higher mind in any way, shape, or form is separate from you. It’s still you. And you’re sending these ideas to yourself.

Therefore, it’s still an exercise in free will and choice, even if it’s coming from the higher mind to the physical, because it’s representative of what you’re saying this theme and this life and this personality is all about. It’s just that you’re doing it in a convenient way where the physical mind doesn’t have to hold on to every single detail of determination. So the idea is that you’re still bringing it to yourself with your free will, but it’s being brought to you, in a sense, as a physical being, through the archetypes and in the style of the overall theme that you chose to explore.

That may seem like destiny, but it’s still the product of your free will from a higher level, because the higher mind is not separate from you. It’s still you as a unique individual. It’s just that the unique person is separated, so to speak, in the experience of a non-physical and a physical component. But it’s still you. So it’s not eliminating your free will. It’s just that free will can be exercised on different levels simultaneously.

The Great Pyramid, Tesla, and Free Energy

Questioner: I wanted to ask you if it’s true that 10,000 years ago the Great Pyramid in Giza was used to harness free energy and every household in Egypt had electricity?

Bashar: No. Not every household in Egypt had electricity. The Great Pyramid, 10,500 years ago, can be used to harness energy and convert it into electrical current, but that was usually mostly used by the priesthood and the Pharaohs and the Kings.

It wasn’t distributed in the way that you think. In Atlantean times, more like 20,000 years ago, the idea was that they knew how to create crystals to vibrate in certain ways that there would be sympathetic vibrations in the crystals distributed throughout the community. And therefore, in that sense, they were able to have light and other forms of energy in the different households.

But that’s not exactly electricity as you understand that, although electric current, to some degree, or electrons—as an electron field, more specifically—was involved in that. It was an attempt to recreate that to some degree with the Giza Pyramid, but it was relatively limited because the idea, initially, of some of that knowledge had been lost, and the ability to recreate some of those crystals was also lost. So it was a lower form of that idea that produced an electron field to some degree, but its use was limited and not capable of being spread very far.

Questioner: How close was Nikola Tesla to rediscovering free energy?

Bashar: Oh, he already discovered it. He absolutely discovered it. It’s just that the information was suppressed.

Questioner: Why was it suppressed?

Bashar: Oh, take a guess.

Questioner: Fear and greed.

Bashar: Thank you.

Questioner: And which present-day countries would be most receptive to implementing free energy?

Bashar: Japan. Because they already have the idea of a collective work ethic that would allow them to focus on it as a project in much the same way that your United States focused on the idea of the Space Race in going to the Moon.

Global Warming and Climate Change

Questioner: I had a question about global warming. How much of it is man-made versus natural, and what are the most effective ways to counter it?

Bashar: It is a natural cycle, but human technology has accelerated it. What you’re experiencing today as climate change, most likely in its natural form, would not necessarily have happened for another 100 to 200 years.

So humanity has accelerated the cycle of climate change. Now, there are many ways that you can create things to be effective, although in many cases, again, you won’t do them because of one reason or another in your society’s estimates and understanding of what you believe you are willing to do.

One of the ways you can counter it is by dispersing very fine particles of gold in the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun or balance it in certain ways and control it with electromagnetic fields.

But again, the idea is that gold is so precious to all of you, or at least most of you, that you are unlikely to use gold for that purpose. That’s one way you could be doing it. There are other ways, and we’ll leave those up to you to discover. But certainly, reducing the idea of waste and destruction on your planet and allowing more natural environments could also slow it down or at least allow you to mitigate it in certain ways.

Parallel Realities and the Grays

Questioner: You mentioned that the Grays spoke English, at least that was one of the languages that they had. It was like, it is on your version of Earth, the primary language of their version of Earth.

Bashar: Yes. In a parallel reality, there weren’t that dissimilar from your version of Earth, although they were more technically advanced than you.

Questioner: So at what point in the past did we have a common reality with the Grays, and what caused the split in the realities?

Bashar: Well, the split’s always been there. It’s another parallel reality. So we never had a common shared reality with them in the way that you’re asking it. It would probably be easier if you just assume that you are always different parallel realities.

You may have had some common things together, but that doesn’t mean you are actually sharing exactly the same reality. I know what you mean, and it might have been almost impossible to tell the difference at certain points in their history from some events in your history. But nevertheless, they are a different reality because they have a different series of choices that they have made.

Some of those choices are being made by some individuals in your version, or at least what you think of as your version. But even that is not actually the same version. As we have said, you’re experiencing more of the splitting prism. And the idea that just because you can see people making choices that are not vibrationally compatible with the choices you may prefer doesn’t mean you’re actually living in the same reality, just because you can see it.